Implementation of Jurimetry in Determining Compensation in the Realm of State Administrative Court

Eka NAM Sihombing; Cynthia Hadita; Novita Sartika Elisabeth

doi:10.55292/japhtnhan.v5i1.205

Authors

Eka NAM Sihombing Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0631-222X
Cynthia Hadita Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6301-7852
Novita Sartika Elisabeth Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55292/japhtnhan.v5i1.205

Keywords:

Urgency, Understanding, Jurimetry, Judge, Judiciary

Abstract

The development of legal technology encourages the presence of a quantitative approach in judicial practice, one of which is through jurimetry. In the context of the State Administrative Court (PTUN), the determination of compensation often faces challenges due to the lack of standard standards and the disparity of decisions. This study aims to analyze the implementation of jurimetry in determining the amount of compensation in the PTUN as an effort to realize legal certainty and measurable justice. The method used is socio-legal research. The results of the study show that the application of jurimetry can be an effective instrument in minimizing the subjectivity of judges through the use of a database of previous decisions and quantitative variables such as the value of material losses, non-material impacts, and the level of official errors. However, the implementation of jurimetry is still limited due to the limitations of data infrastructure and resistance to quantitative approaches in judicial practice. This study concludes that strengthening regulations and digitizing PTUN decision data is needed to support jurimetry as a more transparent and consistent compensation determination mechanism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asimah, Dewi. “Implementasi Perluasan Kompetensi Ptun Dalam Mengadili Tindakan Faktual (Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad/Ood).” Acta Diurnal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Unpad 4, no. 1 (2020).

Asnawi, M. Natsir. “Implementasi Jurimetri Dalam Penentuan Jumlah Nafkah Anak Jurimetrics In Deciding Child Support Allowances 331 - 350.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 5, no. 3 (2016).

Bagus Oktafian Abrianto, Et-al. “Problematika Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Yang Bersifat Fiktif Positif Setelah Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020,”.” Jurnal Arena Hukum 16, no. 3 (2023).

Basah, Sjachran. Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Sikap Tindak Tata Usaha Negara. Bandung: Alumni, 1992.

Basah, Sjahran. Hukum Acara Pengadilan Dalam Lingkungan Peradilan Administrasi. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 1989.

Breyer, Stephen G. Administrative Law and Regulatory Policy. Massachusetts: Aspen Publishing, 2022.

Bruna Armonas Colombo, Pedro Buck, Vinicius Miana. “Challenges When Using Jurimetrics in Brazil—A Survey of Courts.” Future Internet 9, no. 4 (2017): doi:10.3390/ﬁ9040068 www.mdpi.com/journal/futurein.

Coditech. “Process Mining-Enabled Jurimetrics: Analysis of a Brazilian Court’s Judicial Performance in the Business Law Processing.” https://moot.lawgorithm.com.br/schedule/process-mining-enabled-jurimetrics-analysis-of-a-brazilian-courts-judicial-performance-in-the-business-law-processing/?utm_source=chatgpt.com, n.d.

Dalam, Rumusan Hukum Kamar Tata Usaha Negara. “Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2019 Tentang Pemberlakuan Rumusan Hasil Rapat Pleno Kamar Mahkamah Agung Tahun 2019 Sebagai Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tugas Bagi Pengadilan,” 2019.

Faulks, Edward. The Independent Review of Administrative Law, 2021.

Fauzi, Muhammad Alifian Geraldi, and Anna Erliyana. “Pejabat Pemerintahan (Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad).” UNES Law Review 6, no. 2 (2023): 4357–71.

Garner, Bryan A. A Dictionary of Modern Legal Usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.

Hamdan, Fairuz Zahirah Zihni, Dwi Rahayu Kristianti, and Vincentius Verdian. “Limitation of Misconduct of Judges: Increasing The Synergy of Supervision of Judges by The Judicial Commission and The Supreme Court.” Yuridika 38, no. 2 (2023): 371–88. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v38i2.45472.

Hanitijo, Ronny. Metode Penelitian Hukum Dan Jurimetri. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1990.

Indroharto. Usaha Memahami Undang-Undang Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, (Beberapa Pengertian Dasar Hukum Tata Usaha Negara. Jakarta: Sinar Harapan, 2002.

Irianto, Sulistyowati, and Lim Sing Meij. Memperkenalkan Studi Sociolegal Dan Implikasi Metodologisnya. Sulistyowa. Jakarta: PT. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia, 2013.

Kees van Noortwijk, Richard V. de Mulder, dan Pieter Kleve. “New School Case Law Knowledge Management.” In Paper on ’08 Stockholm Legal Conference, 10–11, 2008.

Khoirunnisa, Khoirunnisa, and Rahmi Hidayati. “The Jurimetri Formulation of Court Decisions in the Division of Joint Property.” SMART: Journal of Sharia, Traditon, and Modernity 3, no. 1 (2023): 28. https://doi.org/10.24042/smart.v3i1.16978.

Learning, Refonge. “Understanding Jurimetrics in Plain Terms in US.” https://www.refontelearning.com/blog/top-skills-needed-to-succeed-in-jurimetrics-and-ai-law-careers?utm_source=chatgpt.com, 2025.

Loevinger, Lee. “Jurimetrics: The Methodology of Legal Inquiry.” Law and Contemporary Problems, 1963, 8.

M. Y. Khaerul Umam, Musakkir, and Marwah. “Implementasi Jurimetri Oleh Hakim Dalam Perkara Pembagian Harta Bersama.” El-Iqthisadi Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Fakultas Syariah Dan Hukum 5 (2023): 106–21. https://doi.org/10.24252/el-iqthisady.vi.39438.

Mulder, Kees van Noortwijk dan Richard de. “A Quantitative Analysis of Legal Word Use.” In Annual Conference Hertfordshire, 16 – 17 April, 2007.

NEWS, MARI. “‘Hakim PTUN Harus Jago Matematika.’” https://marinews.mahkamahagung.go.id/artikel/hakim-ptun-harus-jago-matematika-0oX, 2025.

Oliver, Dawn. “The Judge over Your Shoulder.” Parliamentary Affairs 42, no. 3 (1989): 302–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pa.a052200.

Pattipawae, Dezonda Rosiana, Abdullah Abdullah, Hendrik Salmon, and Natanel Lainsamputty. “Due To The Legal Non-Compliance of State Administrative Officers With The Implementation of Forced Money (Dwangsom) In The Execution of State Administrative Decisions.” Sasi 28, no. 2 (2022): 182. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v28i2.730.

“Pleith,+demulder,” n.d.

Publications, News and. “Using Empirical Research to Understand Brazilian IP Practice.” https://www.daniel-ip.com/en/blog/using-empirical-research-to-understand-brazilian-ip-practice/?utm_source=chatgpt.com, 2022.

Ridwan. Diskresi Dan Tanggung Jawab Pemerintah. Yogyakarta: FH UI Press, 2014.

Rumadan, Ismail. “Problematika Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 1, no. 3 (2012): 435. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.1.3.2012.435-462.

Saputro, Aries. “Payment of Compensation for Officials Who Did Not Implement the Decision of the State Administrative Court.” Yuridika 35, no. 2 (2019): 231. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v35i2.15305.

Setiawan, Hendi, Muklis Alâ€TManam, and Wandri Munif. “Some Commentary Notes On Law Number 30 Of 2014 Concerning Government Administration.” Simbur Cahaya XXXI, no. 30 (2025): 270–91. https://doi.org/10.28946/sc.v31i2.3939.

Sudiarawan, Kadek Agus, I Gusti Ngurah Wairocana, and Bagus Hermanto. “Are There Obstacles after the Administrative Court Absolute Competence Extension of Indonesia?” Varia Justicia 16, no. 2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.31603/variajusticia.v16i2.3590.

Sunyoto, Danang. Statistika Deskriptif Dan Probabilitas. Yogyakarta: CAPS, 2016.

Thomas, S Wheeler dan PA. ‘Socio-Legal Studies’ Dalam DJ Hayton, (Ed), Law’s Future(s) Lihat Juga PA Thomas, ‘Socio-Legal Studies: The Case of Disappearing Fleas and Bustards’ (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1997). Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2002.

Wiyono, R. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara, Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2009.